On 05/16/2013 05:23 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 07:35:25PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>
>> > I tested all benchmarks on cover letter maintained, aim7, kbuild etc.
>> > with autogroup enabled. There is no clear performance change.
>> > But since the machine just run benchmark without anyother load, that
>> > doesn't enough.
> Back when we started with smp-fair cgroup muck someone wrote a test for it. I
> _think_ it ended up in the LTP test-suite.
Peter:
copy changlong's testing result again, the ltp cgroup stress testing
show this patchset can reduce the stress testing time:
# run test
7. sudo ./runltp -p -l /tmp/cgroup.results.log -d /tmp -o
/tmp/cgroup.log -f cgroup
my test results:
3.10-rc1 patch1-7 patch1-8
duration=764 duration=754 duration=750
duration=764 duration=754 duration=751
duration=763 duration=755 duration=751
duration means the seconds of testing cost.
Tested-by: Changlong Xie <changlongx....@intel.com>
Paul, would you like to give some comments?
>
> Now I don't know if that's up-to-date enough to catch some of the cases we've
> recently fixed (as in the past few years) so it might want to be updated.
>
> Paul, do you guys at Google have some nice test-cases for all this?
--
Thanks
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
