On 29/05/2013 23:09, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 09:39 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
+void napi_hash_add(struct napi_struct *napi)
+{
+       if (!test_and_set_bit(NAPI_STATE_HASHED, &napi->state)) {
+
+               spin_lock(&napi_hash_lock);
+
+               /* 0 is not a valid id */
+               napi->napi_id = 0;
+               while (!napi->napi_id)
+                       napi->napi_id = ++napi_gen_id;

Suppose we're loading/unloading one driver repeatedly while another one
remains loaded the whole time.  Then once napi_gen_id wraps around, the
same ID can be assigned to multiple contexts.

So far as I can see, assigning the same ID twice will just make polling
stop working for one of the NAPI contexts; I don't think it causes a
crash.  And it is exceedingly unlikely to happen in production.  But if
you're going to the trouble of handling wrap-around at all, you'd better
handle this.

OK


[...]
+/* must be called under rcu_read_lock(), as we dont take a reference */
+struct napi_struct *napi_by_id(int napi_id)
+{
+       unsigned int hash = napi_id % HASH_SIZE(napi_hash);
[...]

napi_id should be declared unsigned int here, as elsewhere.  The
division can't actually yield a negative result because HASH_SIZE() has
type size_t and napi_id is promoted to match, but I had to go and look
at hashtable.h to check that.

Good catch,

Thanks,
Eliezer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to