> So I would think that this block of new major number allocations holds for > 2.5 and not 2.4. Also, if I'm correct, 2.4 won't be needing a lot of new > major numbers anyhow. I wouldnt bet on that. Going to a 32bit dev_t internally without user space noticing would keep it seems to be quite doable if we have to. Right now doesnt worry me, in 2 years time when 2.6 is approaching release the picture might have changed a fair bit - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alexander Viro
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alan Cox
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alexander Viro
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alexander Viro
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alan Cox
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alexander Viro
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Richard Gooch
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants God
- 2.4 To Pending Device Number Registrants bert hubert
- Re: 2.4 To Pending Device Number Registrants Alan Cox
- Re: 2.4 To Pending Device Number Registrants bert hubert
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Arjan van de Ven
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alan Cox
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Kai Henningsen
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Oliver Neukum
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alan Cox
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Dan Hollis
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alan Cox
- Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Alexander Viro