On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Vinod Koul <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:41:38AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Wei Yongjun <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > From: Wei Yongjun <[email protected]> >> > >> > In many of the error handling case, the return value 'ret' not set >> > and 0 will be return from d40_probe() even if error, but we should >> > return a negative error code instead in those error handling case. >> > This patch fixed them, and also removed useless variable 'err'. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <[email protected]> >> > --- >> > v1 -> v2: rebased on linux-next.git >> >> I've tentatively applied this to my dma40 branch, waiting for Vinod >> to ACK it. > I though you wanted me to apply this :) > > Nevertheless, Acked-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]> > > Can you CC stable too, pls.
Hm I'm not sending any DMA40 stuff for stable, sorry ... if you want it to go into stable you'd better pick this (the v3 version) into the DMA tree. Let me know how you want it, I've removed it from my dma40 branch for the time being. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
