On 06/04/2013 12:57 PM, Jay Agarwal wrote: > Registering pciex as peripheral clock instead of fixed clock > as tegra_perih_reset_assert(deassert) api of this clock api > gives warning and ultimately does not succeed to assert(deassert). > > Signed-off-by: Jay Agarwal <[email protected]> > --- > Patch is based on remotes/gitorious_thierryreding_linux/tegra/next and should > be applied on top of this.
For this change, Mike may as well apply it directly to the clock tree. Thierry can then pick it up when he rebases his tegra/next tree. That said, I don't think you should need any of the TEGRA_CLK_DUPLICATE() entries; the PCIe driver should get its clocks from device tree now, and hence the driver name in the clock registration shouldn't be necessary. All of these TEGRA_CLK_DUPLICATE() entries should be removed en mass sometime soon with luck. So, can you simply leave the two TEGRA_CLK_DUPLICATE() entries untouched, rather than changing them? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
