OK, I will rename debug_stack_use_ctr to debug_idt_ctr. Thanks. Seiji
> -----Original Message----- > From: Steven Rostedt [mailto:rost...@goodmis.org] > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 4:58 PM > To: Seiji Aguchi > Cc: H. Peter Anvin; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; x...@kernel.org; > t...@linutronix.de; mi...@elte.hu; b...@alien8.de; linux- > e...@vger.kernel.org; tony.l...@intel.com; dle-deve...@lists.sourceforge.net; > Tomoki Sekiyama > Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 3/3] trace,x86: Add irq vector tracepoints > > On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 20:20 +0000, Seiji Aguchi wrote: > > Steven, > > > > > > > > Hmm, maybe we can do it. Have two counters, a debug_idt_ctr and a > > > trace_idt_ctr, then have a function that basically does this: > > > > > > if (this_cpu_read(debug_idt_ctr)) > > > > I think we can use "debug_stack_use_ctr" for the checking. > > Is it correct? > > Or, do I need to introduce a new debug_idt_ctr? > > > > No, it's the same variable. I was thinking we should rename it too, as > debug_stack_use_ctr, doesn't really describe what is happening anymore. > > -- Steve >
