The second patch is speculative and maybe not necessary. Is a 3KB reduction in object size when embedded and !CONFIG_PRINTK worth it?
Joe Perches (2): jfs: Update jfs_error jfs: Reduce object size when CONFIG_PRINTK=n fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------------ fs/jfs/jfs_dtree.c | 37 +++++++++++++------------- fs/jfs/jfs_extent.c | 2 +- fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------- fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c | 5 ++-- fs/jfs/jfs_superblock.h | 17 +++++++++++- fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c | 2 +- fs/jfs/jfs_xtree.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- fs/jfs/namei.c | 2 +- fs/jfs/resize.c | 2 +- fs/jfs/super.c | 24 ++++++++++------- fs/jfs/xattr.c | 4 +-- 12 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 154 deletions(-) -- 1.8.1.2.459.gbcd45b4.dirty -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
