v2:
        Move comments back before init_tg_cfs_entry(). (Thanks for the notify 
from pjt)

In sched_init(), there is no need to initialize 'root_task_group.shares' and
'root_task_group.cfs_bandwidth' repeatedly.

CC: Paul Tuner <p...@google.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wang...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c |    7 +++++--
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 58453b8..96f69da 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -6955,6 +6955,11 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED */
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
+       root_task_group.shares = ROOT_TASK_GROUP_LOAD;
+       init_cfs_bandwidth(&root_task_group.cfs_bandwidth);
+#endif
+
        for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
                struct rq *rq;
 
@@ -6966,7 +6971,6 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
                init_cfs_rq(&rq->cfs);
                init_rt_rq(&rq->rt, rq);
 #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
-               root_task_group.shares = ROOT_TASK_GROUP_LOAD;
                INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list);
                /*
                 * How much cpu bandwidth does root_task_group get?
@@ -6987,7 +6991,6 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
                 * We achieve this by letting root_task_group's tasks sit
                 * directly in rq->cfs (i.e root_task_group->se[] = NULL).
                 */
-               init_cfs_bandwidth(&root_task_group.cfs_bandwidth);
                init_tg_cfs_entry(&root_task_group, &rq->cfs, NULL, i, NULL);
 #endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
 
-- 
1.7.4.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to