Alexander Viro wrote: > > > > None whatsoever. The one thing that matters is that noone starts making > > the assumption that mapping->host->i_mapping == mapping. > > One actually shouldn't assume that mapping->host is an inode. > What else could it be, since it's a "struct inode *"? NULL? -hpa -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Getting FS access events Richard Gooch
- Re: Fwd: Re: Getting FS access events Matthias Urlichs
- Re: Getting FS access events Linus Torvalds
- Re: Getting FS access events Alexander Viro
- Re: Getting FS access events David Woodhouse
- Re: Getting FS access events Chris Mason
- Re: Getting FS access events H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Getting FS access events Alexander Viro
- Re: Getting FS access events H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Getting FS access events Alexander Viro
- Re: Getting FS access events H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Getting FS access events Alexander Viro
- Re: Getting FS access events H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Getting FS access events Alexander Viro
- Re: Getting FS access events Linus Torvalds
- Re: Getting FS access events H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Getting FS access events Linus Torvalds
- Re: Getting FS access events Jan Harkes
- Re: Getting FS access events Lars Brinkhoff
- Re: Getting FS access events Kai Henningsen
- Re: Getting FS access events Alexander Viro