Hello, Glauber. On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:03:11PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > I am *not* going as far as marking cpuacct deprecated, because I think it > deserves a special discussion (even though my position in this matter is > widely > known), but all the infrastructure to make it happen is here. But after this, > it should be a matter of setting a flag (or not).
I'll ensure that cpuacct can't be used with sane_behavior from cgroup core side, so that it can be deprecated with multiple hierarchies eventually. > Through this patchset I am making cpu cgroup provide the same functionality of > cpuacct, and now with a more clear semantics, I attempt to provide userspace > with enough information to reconstruct per-container version of files like > "/proc/stat". In particular, we are interested in knowing the per-cgroup > slices > of user time, system time, wait time, number of processes, and a variety of > statistics. > > To make sure we can count nr of switches correctly, I am ressurecting one of > Peter's patches that apparently got nowhere in the past. I generally agree with the approach but which tree is it based on? Can you please let me know the base commit so that I can review the series properly? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
