On 31 May 2013 16:20, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 20 May 2013 10:10, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 13 May 2013 11:34, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> On 22 April 2013 12:19, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote: >>>> On 9 April 2013 14:05, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote: >>>>> On 5 April 2013 12:16, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote: >>>>>> On 4 April 2013 18:24, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote: >>>>>>> This patch moves cpufreq driver of powerpc platform to drivers/cpufreq. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> >>>>>>> Cc: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org> >>>>>>> Cc: Olof Johansson <o...@lixom.net> >>>>>>> Cc: linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> Compile Tested only. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig | 31 >>>>>>> ---------------------- >>>>>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/Makefile | 1 - >>>>>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/Makefile | 2 -- >>>>>>> drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.powerpc | 26 >>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>>> drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 3 +++ >>>>>>> .../cpufreq.c => drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c | 0 >>>>>>> .../cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c | 0 >>>>>>> .../cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c | 0 >>>>>>> 8 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) >>>>>>> rename arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/cpufreq.c => >>>>>>> drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c (100%) >>>>>>> rename arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/cpufreq_32.c => >>>>>>> drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c (100%) >>>>>>> rename arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/cpufreq_64.c => >>>>>>> drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c (100%) >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Deepthi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you help testing this please? >>>>> >>>>> Ping!! >>>> >>>> Ping!! >>> >>> Hi Benjamin, >>> >>> Hope you are back from your vacations. Can you give it a try now? >> >> Ping!! > > Ping!!
Hi Rafael, Its been more than 2 months now that this patch was first posted. And the response from Maintainers isn't so great, irrespective of how many times I pinged them. This is what I think: - It looked functionally correct to Benjamin but he wanted somebody to actually test it. - Arnd gave his Ack (So it looked functionally correct to him too) - We can probably push this into linux-next now and see if somebody complains of any breakage it has done. If not we can get it pushed for 3.11. -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
