On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Lee Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> ... as stipulated by the Hardware Specification document. > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]> I think you need Ulf (as ux500 clock author) and Loic (as PRCMU developer) to have a look at this. > -enum prcmu_clock { > - PRCMU_SGACLK, (...) > +#define ARMCLK 0 > +#define PRCMU_ACLK 1 (...) It seems the enum and the defines want to do two different things? The first is a kernel-internal representation of the clocks, whereas the latter is a HW-centric representation for a certain PRCMU variant (I guess?) Does one actually exclude the other? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
