On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 15:07 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> From: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
> 
> There's no point calling it when _alloc() failed.

Thanks, I queued this up for 3.11 as it's not that important for a late
-rc release.

-- Steve

> 
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 7 +------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> index 27963e2bf4bf..bb4950b552b5 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static int __trace_define_field(struct list_head *head, 
> const char *type,
>  
>       field = kmem_cache_alloc(field_cachep, GFP_TRACE);
>       if (!field)
> -             goto err;
> +             return -ENOMEM;
>  
>       field->name = name;
>       field->type = type;
> @@ -114,11 +114,6 @@ static int __trace_define_field(struct list_head *head, 
> const char *type,
>       list_add(&field->link, head);
>  
>       return 0;
> -
> -err:
> -     kmem_cache_free(field_cachep, field);
> -
> -     return -ENOMEM;
>  }
>  
>  int trace_define_field(struct ftrace_event_call *call, const char *type,


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to