-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yesterday, Timothy A. Seufert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

  > Why not take it a step further than just devices?  This is a perfect
  > model for supporting named forks.

Because this only works on filesystems where directories can't themselves
have named forks (or streams, or whatever you wish to call them)
associated with them.

Read the archives on this issue :)

Mo.

- -- 
Mo McKinlay                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]           http://ekto.org
                Read http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
GnuPG/PGP Key: pub  1024D/76A275F9 2000-07-22





-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjsCod0ACgkQRcGgB3aidflJyQCfdjh+o8vZvzZLfowM5QoLGICy
tmAAoMIF4DcyqTep43Hd2/9X9tfeIH9X
=cKMC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to