On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jun 2013, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > > On 6 June 2013 14:17, Lee Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This patch enables clocks to be specified from Device Tree via phandles > > > to the "prcmu-clock" node. > > > > > > Cc: Mike Turquette <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]> > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > drivers/clk/ux500/u8500_clk.c | 50 > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/ux500/u8500_clk.c b/drivers/clk/ux500/u8500_clk.c > > > index 3a7040b..4f5ad4c 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/clk/ux500/u8500_clk.c > > > +++ b/drivers/clk/ux500/u8500_clk.c > > > @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ > > > #include <linux/platform_data/clk-ux500.h> > > > #include "clk.h" > > > > > > +static struct clk *prcmu_clk[PRCMU_NUM_CLKS]; > > > + > > > struct clk *ux500_twocell_get(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec, void > > > *data) > > > > Actually I thought ux500_twocell_get was going to be used in this > > patch, since the previous one was adding this helper function, but it > > isn't? > > Yes it is:
Whoops! No, it's using it in the next patch. There's no requirement for these things to be sequential. I thought it was better to put adding the clocks sequential, rather than have a random addition of a call-back function in the middle of them. -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
