Hi Heiko,
On 10/06/13 20:40, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> pinconf_generic_parse_dt_config() takes a node as input and generates an
> array of generic pinconfig values from the properties of this node.
>
> As I couldn't find a mechanism to count the number of properties of a node
> the function uses internally an array to accept one of parameter and copies
> the real present options to a smaller variable at its end.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <he...@sntech.de>
<snip>
> @@ -139,3 +140,83 @@ void pinconf_generic_dump_config(struct pinctrl_dev
> *pctldev,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinconf_generic_dump_config);
> #endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +struct pinconf_generic_dt_params {
> + const char * const property;
> + enum pin_config_param param;
> + u32 default_value;
> +};
> +
> +static struct pinconf_generic_dt_params dt_params[] = {
> + { "bias-disable", PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE, 0 },
> + { "bias-high-impedance", PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_HIGH_IMPEDANCE, 0 },
> + { "bias-bus-hold", PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_BUS_HOLD, 0 },
> + { "bias-pull-up", PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP, 0 },
> + { "bias-pull-down", PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN, 0 },
> + { "bias-pull-pin-default", PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_PIN_DEFAULT, 0 },
> + { "drive-push-pull", PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_PUSH_PULL, 0 },
> + { "drive-open-drain", PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_OPEN_DRAIN, 0 },
> + { "drive-open-source", PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_OPEN_SOURCE, 0 },
> + { "drive-strength", PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_STRENGTH, 0 },
> + { "input-schmitt-enable", PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_SCHMITT_ENABLE, 1 },
> + { "input-schmitt-disable", PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_SCHMITT_ENABLE, 0 },
> + { "input-schmitt", PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_SCHMITT, 0 },
> + { "input-debounce", PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_DEBOUNCE, 0 },
> + { "power-source", PIN_CONFIG_POWER_SOURCE, 0 },
> + { "slew-rate", PIN_CONFIG_SLEW_RATE, 0 },
> + { "low-power-mode", PIN_CONFIG_LOW_POWER_MODE, 0 },
> + { "output-low", PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT, 0, },
> + { "output-high", PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT, 1, },
shouldn't half of these default to 1 instead of 0? i.e. it's much nicer
for the lone flag "bias-pull-up" to enable pull up rather than disable
it (you even do this in the DT example in the bindings doc).
Otherwise the patch looks good to me (though I haven't tried it yet).
Cheers
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
