On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:26:34AM -0700, Sören Brinkmann wrote: > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 08:23:45PM +0200, Steffen Trumtrar wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 09:41:08AM -0700, Soren Brinkmann wrote: > > > Add a DT fragment for the Zed Zynq platform and a corresponding > > > target to the Makefile > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > I used the 'xlnx,...' compat strings since it seems this is what is > > > used in the Xilinx and Digilent vendor trees. > > > > > > +/include/ "zynq-7000.dtsi" > > > + > > > +/ { > > > + model = "Zynq Zed Development Board"; > > > + compatible = "xlnx,zynq-zed", "xlnx,zynq-7000"; > > > + > > > + memory { > > > + device_type = "memory"; > > > + reg = <0 0x20000000>; > > > + }; > > > + > > > + chosen { > > > + bootargs = "console=ttyPS1,115200 earlyprintk"; > > > + }; > > > + > > > +}; > > > > Hi! > > > > This looks a little bit to basic. No?! Not even an UART? > The UART is imported from the common zynq-7000.dtsi.
Hm, you are actually right, although I think that you shouldn't be. It is possible to NOT use the UARTs, isn't it? So, default on for both UARTs is wrong. > > > The compatible should include digilent or avnet. Digilent only sells to > > academic > > customers, Avnet doesn't. > I don't care at all. So, who makes the decision which one is the correct > one? Actually we could even drop the zed specific one completely and go > with 'xlnx,zynq-7000' only. I'm okay with that. Regards, Steffen -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
