On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:25:48AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> Ah, sorry, I forgot to mention that this patch bases against ext4/master
> branch. Now ext4/dev branch has some regression when I run xfstests.
What regressions are you seeing?
> Ted, I notice that now in ext4 tree we have 'dev', 'dev-with-revert',
> and 'dev2' branches. Which one is the best to generate a new patch for
> the next merge window?
Either the dev branch or the master branch.
The dev-with-revert and dev2 were branches that I had created when
investigating a potential regression with the invalidage page range
patch set. I've since determined that it's a timing issue and it's
not a new regression --- we've had xfstests failures with test
generic/300 for a while now.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
