On Wednesday 19 June 2013 12:58:10 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 06 June 2013 06:47:23 Robin Holt wrote:
> > Preparing to move the parsing of reboot= to generic kernel code
> > forces the change in reboot_mode handling to use the enum.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robin Holt <[email protected]>
> > To: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Russell King <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Russ Anderson <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Robin Holt <[email protected]>
> > Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Guan Xuetao <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <[email protected]>
> > Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Arm Mailing List <[email protected]>
> > Acked-by: Russell King <[email protected]>
>
> Should we merge this through the arm-soc tree?
>
> I'm getting a few conflicts with new platforms getting added
> using the old interface.
Hmm, I realized after sending it that this patch depends on
at least one other patch to add the 'enum'. Any suggestions
for how to handle that?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
