On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 15:00 +0800, xiaoming gao wrote:
> HI Eric
> the problem is as follow:
> br_del_if()-->del_nbp():
>
> list_del_rcu(&p->list);
> dev->priv_flags &= ~IFF_BRIDGE_PORT;
>
> ------>at this point, the nic be deleting still have rx_handler , so , may in
> br_handle_frame()
> ------>br_port_exists() will return false,so br_get_port_rcu() will return
> NULL
> ------>so in br_handle_frame , there will be a null panic.
>
> netdev_rx_handler_unregister(dev);
> synchronize_net();
This code is no longer like that in current tree.
Check commit 4a0b5ec12f0ffc3024616e6dc62cf8a04c54edcd
("bridge: remove a redundant synchronize_net()")
>
>
> i have checked commit 00cfec37484761a44, i think it didn't fix this bug..
I claim adding NULL tests is not needed in the fast path, it was clearly
stated in the changelog.
I would change the dismantle path to make sure br_get_port_rcu() does
not return NULL in the fast path, and remove the test on FF_BRIDGE_PORT
Try something like that :
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c
index 1b8b8b8..2edfb80 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_input.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static int br_pass_frame_up(struct sk_buff *skb)
int br_handle_frame_finish(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
const unsigned char *dest = eth_hdr(skb)->h_dest;
- struct net_bridge_port *p = br_port_get_rcu(skb->dev);
+ struct net_bridge_port *p = __br_port_get_rcu(skb->dev);
struct net_bridge *br;
struct net_bridge_fdb_entry *dst;
struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *mdst;
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ int br_handle_frame_finish(struct sk_buff *skb)
bool unicast = true;
u16 vid = 0;
- if (!p || p->state == BR_STATE_DISABLED)
+ if (p->state == BR_STATE_DISABLED)
goto drop;
if (!br_allowed_ingress(p->br, nbp_get_vlan_info(p), skb, &vid))
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ drop:
/* note: already called with rcu_read_lock */
static int br_handle_local_finish(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
- struct net_bridge_port *p = br_port_get_rcu(skb->dev);
+ struct net_bridge_port *p = __br_port_get_rcu(skb->dev);
u16 vid = 0;
br_vlan_get_tag(skb, &vid);
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ rx_handler_result_t br_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb)
if (!skb)
return RX_HANDLER_CONSUMED;
- p = br_port_get_rcu(skb->dev);
+ p = __br_port_get_rcu(skb->dev);
if (unlikely(is_link_local_ether_addr(dest))) {
/*
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
index 3be89b3..9fdd467 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
+++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
@@ -184,6 +184,11 @@ struct net_bridge_port
#define br_port_exists(dev) (dev->priv_flags & IFF_BRIDGE_PORT)
+static inline struct net_bridge_port *__br_port_get_rcu(const struct
net_device *dev)
+{
+ return rcu_dereference(dev->rx_handler_data);
+}
+
static inline struct net_bridge_port *br_port_get_rcu(const struct net_device
*dev)
{
struct net_bridge_port *port =
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
