On 06/20/2013 03:47 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Chen Gang wrote: >> > On 06/10/2013 10:12 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> > I think we can treat original implementation as for speed optimization, >> > so our discussion is "whether this speed optimization has effect with >> > correctness". > Then I recommend that you to sit down and analyze the correctness of > the code.
That is only your recommend, not mean I have duty to. > > Come back when you have a proof of the code being wrong. And by proof > I mean factual proof not just handwaving theories. At least before say so, please reply: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If we assume "If there is nothing in tv2 which might come before the found timer, then any timer in tv3 will ..." is correct. When we found a timer in 'tv1', we will not search all timers in 'tv2' (we only search first looping of tv2 for the specific 'slot'). Is it still OK ? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you do not want to discuss with others, better quite politely, not need judging or checking others, it is useless for the cooperation with each other, is it right ? ;-) Thanks. -- Chen Gang Asianux Corporation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/