On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Michal Simek <mon...@monstr.eu> wrote:
> On 06/17/2013 07:29 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> I think of_property_read_bool() will accept
>> xlnx,is-dual = <1>; to mean the same as xlnx,is-dual;
>> try it.
>
> First of all sorry for delay.
> You are right that of_property_read_bool()
> also accept xlnx,is-dual = <1>;
> but also accept and return 1 when xlnx,is-dual = <0>;
> which is incorrect behaviour.
OK but that is a coding issue, not a DT bindings design issue.
Can't we think a bit outside the box?
What about something like this:
static bool is_dual (struct device_node *np)
{
struct property *prop = of_find_property(np, "xlnx,is-dual", NULL);
int ret;
u32 val;
if (!prop)
return false;
ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "xlnx,is-dual", &val);
if (ret < 0)
return true; /* node exists but has no cells */
return !!val;
}
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
