On 06/20/2013 01:57 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 2013/6/20 Alexey Brodkin <alexey.brod...@synopsys.com>:
> [snip]
>
>>
>> In general MDIO register gets polled by "libphy" once in a couple of
>> seconds, so delay of 25 milliseconds IMHO is fine.
>>
>>>> +int arc_mdio_probe(struct device_node *dev_node, struct arc_emac_priv 
>>>> *priv)
>>>> +{
>>>
>>>> +       snprintf(bus->id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "%.8x", (unsigned 
>>>> int)priv->regs);
>>>
>>> Is bus->id exposed to user-space somehow?
>>
>> Well as a boot-up message from "libphy":
>> ====
>> libphy: Synopsys MII Bus: probed
>> ====
>
> Well not only as a boot-up message, this serves as unique identifer in
> the entire system for your MDIO bus. It is crucial that you have an
> unique MDIO bus identifier for at least the two following reasons:
>
> - the corresponding kobject/sysfs node that is going to be created
> also needs to be unique in the system
> - you may have multiple MDIO bus in the system (e.g: the one for your
> specific driver and the fixed MDIO bus)

Good explanation. I didn't realize it yet.
And it seems like I talked about bus "name", not "id".

> Since you are using Device Tree already, you may just turn this into:
>
> snprintf(bus->id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "%s", pdev->name);
>
> assuming that your node is already properly labelleled (e.g:
> mdio@deadbeef) which would be exactly equivalent to what you are doing
> with priv->regs;

The thing is I don't have separate "mdio" device description in DT.
Regs value is read from "ethernet" device description.

Here's my DT entry for entire emac:
=============
                ethernet@c0fc2000 {
                        compatible = "snps,arc-emac";
                        reg = <0xc0fc2000 0x3c>;
                        interrupts = <6>;
                        mac-address = [ 00 11 22 33 44 55 ];
                        clock-frequency = <80000000>;
                        max-speed = <100>;
                        phy = <&phy0>;

                        #address-cells = <1>;
                        #size-cells = <0>;
                        phy0: ethernet-phy@0 {
                                reg = <1>;
                        };
                };
=============

So with your proposal bus id will be just "ethernet" which is not that 
unique, right?

That's why address of registers IMHO fits better to a bus id.

-Alexey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to