On 06/20/2013 07:55 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 20 June 2013 16:15, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.c...@samsung.com> wrote: >> Yes, freq->old is same freq->new. >> >> The cpufreq gorvernor(dbs_check_cpu()) send CPUFREQ_LOADCHECK noti >> right after calculating CPUs load, regardless of changing CPU frequency. >> So, I use only freq->old value without using freq->new because load_table >> debugfs file need current cpu frequency. >> >> Now, I can't think of any proper usage for freq->new. >> Do you have good way for using freq->new to include more useful data in >> load_table? > > This information might be interesting.. At what load, we moved from > which freq to which one.. > > Just see if you can add the notification after frequency has been > changed. > OK, I'll modify it and send test result. Thanks.
Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
