Marcelo Tosatti writes: > I was wrong. The patch is indeed buggy because of the __GFP_IO thing. What about the __GFP_IO thing? Specifically, what protects the __GFP_IO thing from happening without my patch? Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: page_launder() bug Linus Torvalds
- Re: page_launder() bug Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: page_launder() bug David S. Miller
- Re: page_launder() bug Linus Torvalds
- Re: page_launder() bug David S. Miller
- Re: page_launder() bug David S. Miller
- Re: page_launder() bug Linus Torvalds
- Re: page_launder() bug Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: page_launder() bug David S. Miller
- Re: page_launder() bug BERECZ Szabolcs
- Re: page_launder() bug David S. Miller
- Re: page_launder() bug Linus Torvalds
- Re: page_launder() bug Mikulas Patocka
- Re: page_launder() bug Rik van Riel
- Another VM race? (was: page_launder() bug) Mikulas Patocka
- Re: Another VM race? (was: page_launder() bug) Rik van Riel
- Re: Another VM race? (was: page_launder() bug) Mikulas Patocka
- Re: page_launder() bug Linus Torvalds
- Re: page_launder() bug Rik van Riel
- Re: page_launder() bug Linus Torvalds
- Re: page_launder() bug Marcelo Tosatti