On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Fabio Baltieri <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 08:40:00AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:17:39AM +0200, Fabio Baltieri wrote: >> > Fix sparse warnings: >> > >> > drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c:81:26: warning: symbol 'dma40_memcpy_conf_phy' was >> > not declared. Should it be static? >> > drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c:95:26: warning: symbol 'dma40_memcpy_conf_log' was >> > not declared. Should it be static? >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <[email protected]> >> Acked-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]> >> >> I guess this would be dependent on recent ste_dma40 patches so best way is >> Linus's tree, right? > > Yes, but I'm not sure Linus is going to send a third pull request for > dma40 so maybe I should just resend my last two dma40 patches for > arm-soc directly.
I've stacked it in my tree, I didn't plan to send another pull request but I guess I have to, or I'll send it as fixes, so I'm taking care of this. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
