On Monday, June 24, 2013 04:37:28 PM Shuah Khan wrote: > On 06/24/2013 10:25 AM, Shuah Khan wrote: > > On 06/23/2013 03:49 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> On Sunday, June 23, 2013 04:34:17 AM Joe Perches wrote: > >>> On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 13:36 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>>> Please keep the existing format as is literally and append any > >>>> new information to the end of the line. > >>> > >>> Hi Shuah. > >>> > >>> Perhaps the better long-term approach would be to add > >>> a new tracepoint too. > >> > >> In fact, I would even prefer it if new tracepoints were added so that we > >> could deprecate the dmesg messages at one point in the future. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Rafael > >> > >> > > > > Rafael/Joe, > > > > I can work on adding a tracepoint. Do you want to take the v2 patch in > > the meantime? > > > > Rafael, > > ok. Caught up with the entire thread. v2 patch uses dev_info() and hence > same concern about format change applies to that one as well. > > Do you want to take the v1 patch that didn't change the format and just > added the additional information at the end?
Well, if you're going to work on the tracepoints, I'll rather not take this at all. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/