[+cc Michael, Alex, Isaku]
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Radim Krčmář <rkrc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> PCIe switch upstream port can be connected directly to the PCIe root bus
> in QEMU; ASPM does not expect this topology and dereferences NULL pointer
> when initializing.
>
> I have not confirmed this can happen on real hardware, but it is presented
> as a feature in QEMU, so there is no reason to panic if we can recover.
This doesn't seem like a valid hardware topology to me. If this *can*
occur on real hardware, we should fix it in Linux. If not, maybe QEMU
should be changed to disallow it.
> The dereference happens with topology defined by
> -M q35 -device x3130-upstream,bus=pcie.0,id=upstream \
> -device xio3130-downstream,bus=upstream,id=downstream,chassis=1
> where on line drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c:530 (alloc_pcie_link_state+13):
> parent = pdev->bus->parent->self->link_state;
> "pdev->bus->parent->self == NULL", because "pdev->bus->parent" has no
> "->parent", hence no "->self".
>
> Even though discouraged by QEMU documentation, one can set up even
> topology without the upstream port
> -M q35 -device xio3130-downstream,bus=pcie.0,id=downstream,chassis=1
> so "pdev->bus->parent == NULL", because "pdev->bus" is the root bus.
> The patch checks for this too, because I do not like *NULL.
>
> Right now, PCIe switch has to connect to the root port
> -M q35 -device ioh3420,bus=pcie.0,id=root.0 \
> -device x3130-upstream,bus=root.0,id=upstream \
> -device xio3130-downstream,bus=upstream,id=downstream,chassis=1
>
> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrc...@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> index 403a443..1ad1514 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> @@ -527,8 +527,8 @@ static struct pcie_link_state
> *alloc_pcie_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> link->pdev = pdev;
> if (pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM) {
> struct pcie_link_state *parent;
> - parent = pdev->bus->parent->self->link_state;
> - if (!parent) {
> + if (!pdev->bus->parent || !pdev->bus->parent->self ||
> + !(parent = pdev->bus->parent->self->link_state)) {
> kfree(link);
> return NULL;
> }
> --
> 1.8.1.4
I don't really want to further complicate the "if" statement you're
changing. The link state allocation is pretty obtuse already, and if
this situation only occurs in QEMU, we're likely to break it again
when somebody refactors this code.
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
