On 06/25/2013 01:00 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
> some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
> do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
> commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
> is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
> with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
>
> After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
> the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
> we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
>
> Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
> notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
> are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
> arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
> As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
> content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
> of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
>
> This removes all the arch/arc uses of the __cpuinit macros from
> all C files. Currently arc does not have any __CPUINIT used in
> assembly files.
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
>
> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgu...@synopsys.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com>
Applied to ARC for-curr (for 3.11)
Thx a bunch,
-Vineet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
