Hi,
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 06:37:03PM +0530, Ravi Babu wrote:
> Adding babble_recovery operation as part of musb->ops, used
> to recover from babble condition during babble interrupt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Babu <ravib...@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c | 6 ++++++
> drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c
> index ab6fa39..411c29d 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c
> @@ -857,6 +857,12 @@ b_host:
> }
> }
>
> + /* handle babble condition */
> + if (int_usb & MUSB_INTR_BABBLE) {
> + pr_info("babble: restarting the musb controller..");
> + musb_babble_recovery(musb);
> + }
> +
> #if 0
> /* REVISIT ... this would be for multiplexing periodic endpoints, or
> * supporting transfer phasing to prevent exceeding ISO bandwidth
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h
> index f96e899..bf37dc9 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h
> +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h
> @@ -213,6 +213,8 @@ struct musb_platform_ops {
> int (*adjust_channel_params)(struct dma_channel *channel,
> u16 packet_sz, u8 *mode,
> dma_addr_t *dma_addr, u32 *len);
> +
> + void (*babble_recovery)(struct musb *musb);I don't get why can't 'babble_recovery' be generic. Why do we need each glue layer to implement it ? -- balbi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
