* Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:37:13AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Would be very nice to randomize the sampling rate, by randomizing the
> > intervals within a 1% range or so - perf tooling will probably recognize
> > the different weights.
>
> You're suggesting adding noise to the regular kernel tick?
No, to the perf interval (which I assumed Mike was using to profile this?)
- although slightly randomizing the kernel tick might make sense as well,
especially if it's hrtimer driven and reprogrammed anyway.
I might have gotten it all wrong though ...
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
