Martin Dalecki writes: > Erm... I wasn't talking about the DESIRED state of affairs! > I was talking about the CURRENT state of affairs. OK? Oh, but in 1995 it was quite possible to compile the kernel with kdev_t a pointer type, and I have done it several times since. The kernel keeps growing, so each time it is more work than the previous time. > At least you have admitted that you where the one responsible > for the design of this MESS. Thank you! However, you give me too much honour. Andries - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Jens Axboe
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Jens Axboe
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Martin Dalecki
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] struct char_device Andries . Brouwer