On Thursday 27 June 2013 08:30:40 Chen Gang wrote:
> On 06/26/2013 10:07 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 04:26:41AM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
> > I wonder whether it makes sense to include pci-dma-compat.h in
> > asm-generic/pci.h, I don't see why one would want the generic pci.h but
> > not the generic pci-dma-compat.h (cc'ing Arnd).
>
> I think, it will let architecture guys easier to add their own
> pci-dma-compat.h (although they still need generic pci_dma_compat.h, and
> generic pci.h, too).
>
> e.g. one architecture want include generic pci-dma-compat.h firstly,
> then define its own features in its own pci-dma-compat.h.
I think there is no excuse for still keeping the asm-generic/pci-dma-compat.h
header around any more.
All architectures use the same implementation and have done so for years.
We should just convert the remaining users to use the dma_mapping.h
interfaces directly.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
