On Mon, 21 May 2001, David Weinehall wrote: > IMVHO every developer involved in memory-management (and indeed, any > software development; the authors of ntpd comes in mind here) should > have a 386 with 4MB of RAM and some 16MB of swap. Nowadays I have the > luxury of a 486 with 8MB of RAM and 32MB of swap as a firewall, but it's > still a pain to work with. You're absolutely right. The smallest thing I'm testing with on a regular basis is my dual pentium machine, booted with mem=8m or mem=16m. Time to hunt around for a 386 or 486 which is limited to such a small amount of RAM ;) cheers, Rik -- Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Rik van Riel
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Mike Galbraith
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Rik van Riel
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Mike Galbraith
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Rik van Riel
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Mike Galbraith
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Rik van Riel
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Pavel Machek
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 David Weinehall
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Rik van Riel
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Jonathan Morton
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Pavel Machek
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Scott Anderson
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 David Weinehall
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Pavel Machek
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Mike Galbraith
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Rik van Riel
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Mike Galbraith
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Rik van Riel
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10 Mike Galbraith