Hi!
> > My vote would be for a new socket family for the low-level protocol,
> > with room for extension later to support the advanced features.
> >
> > This should be one of the simplest socket implementations possible, if
> > you just need to send and receive 32 bit words, and can bind to a
> > a set of labels for rx as you described above.
> >
> > The only possible concern I see with that interface is slightly higher
> > latency than what you would be able to get with a straight read/write
> > based character device.
> >
> Any further feedback on this ?
>
> Key question: Would a new address family have a chance of being accepted ?
Yes... that seems like cleanest way to implement it.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
