Hi Mark,

Thanks for the review.
Comments in lined.
On Monday 01 July 2013 04:26 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 01:11:11PM +0530, Sourav Poddar wrote:

+static int dra7xxx_qspi_prepare_xfer(struct spi_master *master)
+{
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static int dra7xxx_qspi_unprepare_xfer(struct spi_master *master)
+{
+       return 0;
+}
Remove empty functions, though...

+       if (flags&  XFER_END)
+               dra7xxx_writel(qspi, qspi->cmd | QSPI_INVAL, QSPI_SPI_CMD_REG);
+
+       pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(qspi->dev);
+       pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(qspi->dev);
...there's no point in doing this per-message, it should be in the
prepare and unprepare functions.

Ok, will do runtime PM part in prepare/unprepare in my next version.
+       master = spi_alloc_master(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*qspi));
+       if (!master)
+               return -ENOMEM;
+
+       master->mode_bits = SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA;
+
+       master->num_chipselect = 1;
+       master->bus_num = -1;
+       master->setup = dra7xxx_qspi_setup;
+       master->prepare_transfer_hardware = dra7xxx_qspi_prepare_xfer;
+       master->transfer_one_message = dra7xxx_qspi_start_transfer_one;
+       master->unprepare_transfer_hardware = dra7xxx_qspi_unprepare_xfer;
+       master->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
There should be some bits per word restrictions in here I think - it
looks like only 8 bits per word is supported.

Yes, currently its only 8 bits per word support.
Yes, bits_per_word_mask can be filled to support upto 32 bits word
transition. Will add in v2.
+       qspi->base = devm_request_and_ioremap(&pdev->dev, r);
+       if (!qspi->base) {
+               dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "can't ioremap MCSPI\n");
+               ret = -ENOMEM;
+               goto free_master;
+       }
Use devm_ioremap_resource().

Ok. Will replace.
+       if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "spi-max-frequency",&max_freq))
+               qspi->spi_max_frequency = max_freq;
You have OF bindings, there should be a binding document and an OF ID
table.
Yes, will add binding documentation in my next version.

Though, I have a "of_device_id" [1] populated in my patch.

May be, I need to re-arrange it above probe function. ?

[1]:
+
+static const struct of_device_id dra7xxx_qspi_match[] = {
+    {.compatible = "ti,dra7xxx-qspi" },
+    {},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, dra7xxx_qspi_match);
+


Thanks,
Sourav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to