On 02/07/2013 23:10, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 12:49 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
Time in range will fail safely if we move to a different cpu with an
extremely large clock skew.
Add time_in_range64() and convert lls to use it.
Signed-off-by: Eliezer Tamir <[email protected]>
---
v1->v2
fixed double call to sched_clock() in can_poll_ll(), checkpatchisms
+#define time_in_range64(a, b, c) \
+ (time_after_eq64(a, b) && \
+ time_before_eq64(a, c))
[...]
Why not make this an inline function, so the caller doesn't need to
worry about repeated evaluation?
I was following the conventions in jiffies.h
(well almost, I did add a few spaces to make checkpatch happy)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
