On 07/02, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > On 07/02, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > I'm actually worried about this change. > > Me too. > > But again. Any reason trace_remove_event_call() should succeed if > this this ftrace_event_call is active?
And note that kprobes/uprobes are the only users of trace_remove_event_call(), and both need the same semantics: kill it only if it is not active. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
