3.6.11.6 stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Christian Gmeiner <[email protected]> [ Upstream commit 4b949b8af12e24b8a48fa5bb775a13b558d9f4da ] During the development of this driver an in-house register documentation was used. The last week some integration tests were done and this problem was found. It turned out that the released register documentation is wrong. The fix is very simple: shift all masks by one. Signed-off-by: Christian Gmeiner <[email protected]> Cc: Bryan Wu <[email protected]> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> --- drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c b/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c index c464682..676e729 100644 --- a/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c @@ -47,37 +47,37 @@ static struct ot200_led leds[] = { { .name = "led_1", .port = 0x49, - .mask = BIT(7), + .mask = BIT(6), }, { .name = "led_2", .port = 0x49, - .mask = BIT(6), + .mask = BIT(5), }, { .name = "led_3", .port = 0x49, - .mask = BIT(5), + .mask = BIT(4), }, { .name = "led_4", .port = 0x49, - .mask = BIT(4), + .mask = BIT(3), }, { .name = "led_5", .port = 0x49, - .mask = BIT(3), + .mask = BIT(2), }, { .name = "led_6", .port = 0x49, - .mask = BIT(2), + .mask = BIT(1), }, { .name = "led_7", .port = 0x49, - .mask = BIT(1), + .mask = BIT(0), } }; -- 1.7.10.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
