On Fri, 5 Jul 2013, Dave Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 05:15:07PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Jul 2013, Dave Jones wrote: > > > > > BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 23s! [trinity-child1:14565] > > > perf samples too long (2519 > 2500), lowering > kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 50000 > > > INFO: NMI handler (perf_event_nmi_handler) took too long to run: > 238147.002 msecs > > > > So we see a softlockup of 23 seconds and the perf_event_nmi_handler > > claims it did run 23.8 seconds. > > > > Are there more instances of NMI handler messages ? > > [ 2552.006181] perf samples too long (2511 > 2500), lowering > kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 50000 > [ 2552.008680] INFO: NMI handler (perf_event_nmi_handler) took too long to > run: 500392.002 msecs
Yuck. Spending 50 seconds in NMI context surely explains a softlockup :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
