On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 10:55:10PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 05 July 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Is this actually OK with the FIQ APIs? > I don't know. Why wouldn't it? It was the only reason I could think of why that'd have been done. > Other users of the same interfaces (mx1_camera, spi-s3c24xx) can also be > modules, so I wouldn't expect a fundamental issue. OK.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
