On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 00:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 02:11:05 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 01:32:42 PM Toshi Kani wrote: > > > On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 02:10 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > > > > > > > > An ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK notification means that we should scan the > > > > entire namespace starting from the given handle even if the device > > > > represented by that handle is present (other devices below it may > > > > just have been added). > > > > > > > > For this reason, modify acpi_scan_bus_device_check() to always run > > > > acpi_bus_scan() if the notification being handled is of type > > > > ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > > > > Cc: 3.10+ <sta...@vger.kernel.org> > > > > > > Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.k...@hp.com> > > > > > > But, I think we need the additional patch below. > > > > Yes, I think you're right. > > That said I'd prefer to put the check into acpi_bus_device_attach() like in > the appended patch.
That's fine by me. Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.k...@hp.com> Just a minor point, though. Isn't it a bit inconsistent with device_attach(), which checks dev->driver inside the function? That said, I am OK with either way. Thanks, -Toshi > > Thanks, > Rafael > > > --- > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > Subject: ACPI / scan: Do not try to attach scan handlers to devices having > them > > In acpi_bus_device_attach(), if there is an ACPI device object > for the given handle and that device object has a scan handler > attached to it already, there's nothing more to do for that handle > and the function should just return success immediately. Make > that happen. > > Reported-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.k...@hp.com> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > --- > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c > +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c > @@ -1984,6 +1984,9 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_device_attac > if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device)) > return AE_CTRL_DEPTH; > > + if (device->handler) > + return AE_OK; > + > ret = acpi_scan_attach_handler(device); > if (ret) > return ret > 0 ? AE_OK : AE_CTRL_DEPTH; > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
