> But the real question is whether the old tools have enough value to be > worth the effort. What problem are you trying to solve here? Im just playing with ideas and writing a CML1 parser for amusement while I ponder single pass computation of the entire dependancy graph from a CML1 rule base 8) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up Kai Germaschewski
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads... Wayne . Brown
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads... Alan Cox
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads... Alan Cox
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads... Mike Castle
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads... Wayne . Brown
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads... M.
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy h... Alan Cox
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosop... Brent D. Norris
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design phil... Eric S. Raymond