Thanks,

All 4 applied to the togreg branch of iio.git

Jonathan

On 07/12/2013 10:46 PM, Pandruvada, Srinivas wrote:
> Tested and ready to go.
> 
> Thanks,
> Srinivas
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Cameron [mailto:ji...@kernel.org] 
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 11:45 AM
> To: Alexander Holler
> Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; 
> linux-...@vger.kernel.org; Jonathan Cameron; Pandruvada, Srinivas
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] iio: hid-sensor: add module alias for autoload
> 
> On 07/12/2013 08:21 AM, Alexander Holler wrote:
>> Am 11.07.2013 19:27, schrieb Srinivas Pandruvada:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/10/2013 08:58 AM, Alexander Holler wrote:
>>>> Am 10.07.2013 17:27, schrieb Srinivas Pandruvada:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> There was no intention to prevent auto loading. Did you get chance 
>>>>> to test these changes?
>>>>
>>>> Sure, I always test patches before I send them out.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, I haven't tested the changes with the iio HID drivers (I don't 
>>>> have any commercial HID sensor hub, so I've just compile tested 
>>>> these patches here, double reading them), but I've tested the 
>>>> similiar changes with a patch for rtc-hid-sensor-time I've send out 
>>>> yesterday.
>>>> (sorry, no link, lkml.org seems dead, just search for
>>>> "rtc-hid-sensor-time: add module alias")
>>>>
>>>> It works just fine. An example output is now
>>>>
>>>> Jul  9 19:27:21 dockstar3 kernel: [    5.124444] rtc_hid_sensor_time
>>>> HID-SENSOR-2000a0.0: milliseconds supported
>>>> Jul  9 19:27:21 dockstar3 kernel: [    5.132864] rtc_hid_sensor_time
>>>> HID-SENSOR-2000a0.0: rtc core: setting system clock to 2013-07-09
>>>> 17:26:51:328000 UTC (1373390811)
>>>> Jul  9 19:27:21 dockstar3 kernel: [    5.146105] rtc_hid_sensor_time
>>>> HID-SENSOR-2000a0.0: rtc core: registered hid-sensor-time as rtc0
>>>>
>>>> Before the output was e.g.
>>>>
>>>> HID-SENSOR-2000a0 HID-SENSOR-2000a0.0: rtc core: registered 
>>>> hid-sensor-time as rtc0
>>>>
>>>> instead of the above with the descriptive rtc_hid_sensor_time.
>>> <Agreed. This is better. >
>>>> Automatic loading of modules works too and it works on ARM, Intel 
>>>> and AMD as module or static linked. ;)
>>
>> Do you have tested the patches with a real device? I assume you have 
>> one. ;)
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Alexander Holler
> 
> Just so you two know. Given this discussion, I'll be lazy about these and 
> wait for an Ack from Srinivas before taking these.  Look fine to me, but nice 
> to have confirmation as you say with the actual hardware!
> 
> Jonathan
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to