On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 17:49 +0100, David Ahern wrote: > With all the perf ioctl extensions tossed out the past day or so I > wanted to revive this request. Still need a solution to the problem of > correlating perf_clock to other clocks ...
And I second. We've been trying to squeeze the solution into the posix clock framework (and vdso) but it didn't get anywhere, really. I've spoken to John last week and although there is one more potential "solution" (and the quotes are meaningful ;-), it seems that the perf-specific ioctl would work for all interested individuals for now. Paweł -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
