On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:21:23AM +0800, Peng Tao wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:13:57PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:40:30 -0700 Greg Kroah-Hartman > >> <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:16:29AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > >> > > On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 22:27 +0800, Peng Tao wrote: > >> > > > Hi Greg, > >> > > > > >> > > > Now that 3.11-rc1 is out, please consider queuing following patches > >> > > > to > >> > > > fix various Lustre client build issues. I've verified that we can now > >> > > > pass build on sparc/mips/s390/powerpc/x86, both 32bits and 64bits. > >> > > > >> > > These patches apply to linus' current, but not to -next > >> > > where other lustre patches have already been applied. > >> > > >> > What trees are those in? I have nothing in my staging-next branch right > >> > now, so they didn't come from there, which is where I will be applying > >> > this to. > >> > >> See the five patches I sent you on July 8 ;) > >> > >> I'll resend. > > > > I got them, I couldn't apply them until after -rc1 is out, so I'll queue > > them up later this week. > > > Hi Greg and Andrew, > > One issue with the five patches is that the shrinker API change is not > in Linus' tree. So if Greg merges them in staging tree, Lustre cannot > build there. Is it OK to break in staging tree and just to make sure > -next can build?
lustre can't build anyway, so what's the issue? :) I'll not apply those patches, don't worry, the shrinker stuff needs to stay in Andrew's tree until it hits Linus's. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/