Richard Weinberger wrote: > BTW: I'll not apply any patch to the kernel if the issue can easily > fixed in user space, that's the major reason for my NAK.
I was just asking for good defaults; I want um Linux to work out-of-the-box. There's really no point in creating bogus devices in /dev, and make life unnecessarily hard for user-space applications: instead of checking for existence, they'd have to check that all the devices work. I doubt systemd will accept such a patch, just to bend over backwards and support um. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
