Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 01:47:47PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > There's only one caller of do_generic_file_read() and the only actor is
> > file_read_actor(). No reason to have a callback parameter.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Would it make sense to do the same thing to do_shmem_file_read()?
> 
> From: Matthew Wilcox <wi...@linux.intel.com>
> 
> There's only one caller of do_shmem_file_read() and the only actor is
> file_read_actor(). No reason to have a callback parameter.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <wi...@linux.intel.com>

Looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com>

v3.11-rc1 brings one more user for read_actor_t -- lustre. But it seemes
it's artifact of ages when f_op had ->sendfile and it's not in use
anymore.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to