On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 04:15:55PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > "Your code breaks the build for every platform. Would you please kindly > consider fixing it ?"
Something like this: https://lists.launchpad.net/ac100/msg01040.html "small typo here." Marc, was obviously dripping with sarcasm when he wrote that, but it was completely lost on the patch submitter. I've done that too where I asked "Are you sure you want to call schedule() while holding a spinlock()?" It ended up becoming flame fest and it could have been avoided if I had said, "You are not allowed to call shedule() while holding a spinlock." Also instead of saying "Your code is crap", I prefer to say "This patch is crap." I suspect the submitters secretly know I think they are crap too along with their code, but it's important to maintain the facade. :) One other thing which is tricky is if there is someone whose patches are so worthless it's just a waste of time. There have been a couple times where I've told people to stop submitting patches until they have a few more years of programming experience. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
