From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcg...@do-not-panic.com>
The Linux kernel had tons of code which at times cleared the
drvdata upon probe failure or release. There are however a bunch
of drivers that didn't clear this.
Commit 0998d063 implmented clearing this upon device_release_driver()
and dealt with probe failure on driver_probe_device(). After this the
kernel was cleaned up separately with *tons* of patches to remove all
these driver specific settings given that the clearing is now done
internally by the device core.
Instead of ifdef'ing code back in for older code where it was properly
in place backport this by piggy backing the new required code upon the
calls used in place. There is a small race here upon device_release_driver()
but we can live with that theoretical race.
Due to the way we hack this backport we can't use a separate namespace
as we have with other symbols.
mcgrof@frijol ~/linux-stable (git::master)$ git describe --contains \
0998d0631001288a5974afc0b2a5f568bcdecb4d
v3.6-rc1~99^2~14^2~17
I count 65 patches implemented after this:
mcgrof@frijol ~/linux-stable (git::master)$ git format-patch \
--grep="device-core: Ensure drvdata = NULL when no driver is bound" \
-o null-drv-fix v3.6-rc1~99^2~14^2~17..
TL;DR
Alan Stern argued that perhaps applying this to backports wasn't a good
idea given that evidence shows that the original patch actually exposed
tons of bugs in driver code where they were doing the wrong thing.
While this may be true if the original patch was a bad idea it should
be reverted, and if a bug is found upstream, then by all means
finding it through backports will only accelerate the pace at which
we fix these exposed bugs. That is, if a bug is found due to this on
backports then a respective fix for it should go upstream, not to
backports. This is the benefit of providing backports releases: keep
your users engaged on upstream fixes.
Furthermore I am in hopes that perhaps we can SmPL'ify the bugs
instead and in the future perhaps require SmPL to proove that
the what the original patch was doing won't affect the inverse
of what the patch was trying to do -- that is drivers doing the
wrong thing.
commit 0998d0631001288a5974afc0b2a5f568bcdecb4d
Author: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com>
Date: Wed May 23 00:09:34 2012 +0200
device-core: Ensure drvdata = NULL when no driver is bound
1) drvdata is for a driver to store a pointer to driver specific data
2) If no driver is bound, there is no driver specific data associated with
the device
3) Thus logically drvdata should be NULL if no driver is bound.
But many drivers don't clear drvdata on device_release, or set drvdata
early on in probe and leave it set on probe error. Both of which results
in a dangling pointer in drvdata.
This patch enforce for drvdata to be NULL after device_release or on probe
failure.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
Tested with ckmake against next-20130618:
1 2.6.24 [ OK ]
2 2.6.25 [ OK ]
3 2.6.26 [ OK ]
4 2.6.27 [ OK ]
5 2.6.28 [ OK ]
6 2.6.29 [ OK ]
7 2.6.30 [ OK ]
8 2.6.31 [ OK ]
9 2.6.32 [ OK ]
10 2.6.33 [ OK ]
11 2.6.34 [ OK ]
12 2.6.35 [ OK ]
13 2.6.36 [ OK ]
14 2.6.37 [ OK ]
15 2.6.38 [ OK ]
16 2.6.39 [ OK ]
17 3.0.79 [ OK ]
18 3.1.10 [ OK ]
19 3.10-rc1 [ OK ]
20 3.2.45 [ OK ]
21 3.3.8 [ OK ]
22 3.4.46 [ OK ]
23 3.5.7 [ OK ]
24 3.6.11 [ OK ]
25 3.7.10 [ OK ]
26 3.8.13 [ OK ]
27 3.9.3 [ OK ]
real 32m2.332s
user 860m23.688s
sys 121m20.840s
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr>
Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jsl...@suse.cz>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkos...@suse.cz>
Cc: Felix Fietkau <n...@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcg...@do-not-panic.com>
---
backport/backport-include/linux/device.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/backport/backport-include/linux/device.h
b/backport/backport-include/linux/device.h
index c2f80e2..ba55d0e 100644
--- a/backport/backport-include/linux/device.h
+++ b/backport/backport-include/linux/device.h
@@ -176,4 +176,23 @@ extern int dev_set_name(struct device *dev, const char
*name, ...)
__attribute__((format(printf, 2, 3)));
#endif
+#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE <= KERNEL_VERSION(3,6,0)
+#define driver_probe_device(__drv, __dev) \
+({ \
+ int ret; \
+ ret = (driver_probe_device)(__drv, __dev); \
+ if (ret) \
+ dev_set_drvdata(__dev, NULL); \
+ return ret; \
+})
+
+#define device_release_driver(__dev) \
+({ \
+ (device_release_driver)(__dev); \
+ device_lock(__dev); \
+ dev_set_drvdata(__dev, NULL); \
+ device_unlock(__dev); \
+})
+#endif /* LINUX_VERSION_CODE <= KERNEL_VERSION(3,6,0) */
+
#endif /* __BACKPORT_DEVICE_H */
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
